Showing posts with label NWP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NWP. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2015

Confronting My Own Bias

A week after presenting at a Pennsylvania Writing & Literature Project graduate course, Grammar Matters, I received an envelope chock-full of thank you notes from the participants in the mail. Among the cards, one teacher wrote, "Thank you for helping me confront my own bias about grading."

That statement, confronting my own bias, energizes me.

Not that the note in any way, shape, or form validates any sense of right and wrong or who has the answers and who does not. To the contrary, it reminds me that I am and will forever be in that place as well--confronting my own bias. In other words, growing.

In ten years I will be able to see through the lens of further experience and exposure to mentors--and that kind of growth is invigorating. I am not afraid of knowing that I can, will, and should grow--even though I am twenty years in to the profession--actually, especially since I am twenty years into the profession.

I was reluctant to confront my own bias for far too many years. I did not reflect, read, or write. I simply taught. And I believed I was doing a good job. I wanted to do a good job. My intentions were sincere and from a good place. However, in retrospect, how paralyzing (even just reconsidering) that  former mindset feels now. I was paralyzed within my own bias and I could not recognize it.

Side note: that bias includes more than grading. I have carried biases in writing, grammar, assessment, classroom management, reading, et al. Much of my bias came from not only how I was taught but also how I came to cope and learn.

A team of mentors helped me confront my bias. Donald Graves, one of those important mentors, never met me. But I meet him again and again through his writing. After reading the thank you notes today, I pulled out Writing: Teachers & Children at Work to read from Graves's valuable insights again.

What strikes me today in Writing: Teachers & Children at Work is that Graves tells us children want to write--even on the first day of school:
"Children want to write. They want to write the first day they attend school. This is no accident. Before they went to school they marked up walls, pavements, newspapers with crayons, chalk, pens or pencils...anything that makes a mark. The child's marks say, 'I am.'" (3)
This is the beauty of Graves in my world. He writes so many lines--let alone passages--which serve as a flashpoint--an invitation--for me to confront my own bias.
"We have all heard the groan in the classrooms, 'Do I have to copy it over?' This is the popular understanding of revision. Put a good manicure on a corpse. (4)"
We could go on and discuss Graves--and I hope I spend the rest of my career (and life) doing just that with colleagues (new and familiar). But here, today, I just want to point out that when I read Graves I not only find compelling statements, but also I find an educator who displayed humility and curiosity. take that lesson to heart. 

Humility.

I try to practice humility just as much as I try to practice his concrete teaching points on writing and children. Humility is not always easy, but it is a conscious choice. Graves knew he wasn't perfect, and he embraced the energy of humility (scary! thrilling!) in his life's work. Writing and children invited him to confront his own biases and therein made him feel alive in his work. 

When people or experiences or places make us feel alive, we fall in love.

And so I appreciate the teacher who took the time to write to me in a note, "Thank you for helping me confront my own bias about grading." I imagine that kind of challenge made him feel alive and energized for September.

I am right there with him. Thank you, Jim. Have a wonderful year!

I am wondering what other experiences teachers have had which helped them feel alive, confront their own bias, or even fall in love with the craft of teaching and/or writing...

Friday, July 13, 2012

Resource Review: The Craft of Revision

The Craft of RevisionThe Craft of Revision by Donald Morison Murray
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Murray cautions us:
“Students, first of all, must learn a positive attitude toward revision. The process of revision, for most students, has not been concerned with finding meaning, but it has focused on editing superficial mechanical and grammatical errors to a preconceived and often not clearly understood standard.”

My reaction:
The one word I’m left with is INFORMATION. It seems most of the revision process is rooted in arranging, adding, removing, improving, and making decisions based on the best use of the best information in each moment.  The title could very easily be "The Craft of Writing" because as Murray demonstrates the very act of writing itself is a revision of our thoughts or the seed of an idea.

Format of each chapter:
Murray explains one concept at a time
Organizes chapters in a very specific order / how to write, rewrite, rewrite, rewrite
Most chapters offer exercises and/or examples
Some chapters offer Common Problems and their Solutions
Interviews with different writers at end of each chapter


1. Getting Writing Done—creating a discovery draft
No such thing as writer’s block. Excuse for poor habits.
a. “Writing becomes relatively easy if writing becomes a daily habit.”
i. No truck driver refused to work today because of truck driver’s block
b. Know tomorrow’s tasks today
ii. Know the territory and the task for tomorrow’s writing today


2. Rewrite to Focus

Exercise:
An effective piece of writing says on thing and, before rewriting a draft, you should be able to state it in a single sentence. (Steinbeck did it.)

Exercise:
To discover and state the focus be able to answer the following questions with specific, brief statement: a sentence or less.
a. what is the single dominant meaning
b. what is the central tension within the dominant meaning?
c. What do test readers say is the meaning of the draft?

Exercise:
Frame Your Meaning
a. like framing a picture with a camera
b. draw a box around a part of a picture
c. use the frame like a zoom lens
a. give students same picture with different size frames
b. write a piece on the picture





3. Rewrite to Collect (information)
a. writers write with information
i. words are symbols of information
b. don’t be word-drunk
i. readers hungry for information, images, facts, insights
c. readers read to become an authority
d. concrete, accurate, significant details
i. creates trust
ii. makes writing lively

4. Rewrite for External Order
a. you should have a draft and a bunch of information to work into it
b. now you need to shape everything and take control of it
c. FORM IS MEANING
i. 5 paragraph essay may seem harmless (but it isn’t)
-5 paragraph essays lives only in a school, not real world writing
-suggests that FORM is more important than the content
-suggests that meaning can be changed to fit the form
-there is one right way to tell all stories
-the reader has to be told what the message will be, what the message is, what it means
d. the purpose of the form is to carry meaning to the reader
i. essay? Narrative? Argument? Expository? et al…

5. Rewrite for Internal Order
a. Readers should be able to follow a trail of information
b. Remember a reader is always in control and it is up to you to give them a trail worth following (“a seductive trail”)

Exercise: Answer the reader’s questions
a. all effective writers hear the reader’s questions and answers them immediately
i. How come? How do you know that? Says who? I’d like to know more about that… Why’d she do that? Whoa, back up, I don’t understand…

Exercise: Outline after writing
a. to expose the structure of the draft
b. adapt/redesign the structure

6. Rewrite to Develop
a. an underdeveloped draft is fully developed in a writer’s mind but not on paper
b. stand back and look at it like a reader (hungry for information)
c. look for the signs of an underdeveloped draft:
-it is predictable
-it could have been written by anyone
-there is no individual vision
-the reader learns nothing the reader did not already know
d. develop with information
-reveal with specifics
-write with abundance
e. develop with authority
-convince with authority
-persuade with evidence
f. develop with clarity
-dominant impression-every piece of info supports a single meaning
-the reader should receive information in a natural order
g. develop with context
-address the reader who asks, “So what?”
h. rewriting starts with rereading
-read fragments of your writing
-search for code words or words that have meaning only to you
-read to add snapshots of memories that haunt or move us

Exercise – Emphasize the Significant
a. Arrange and Rearrange paragrahs in a 2-3-1 order
b. moving the most significant information to the edges will clarify the writing

7. Rewrite with Voice
a. lack of voice is most common reason we stop reading
b. signs of a draft without voice:
-no individual human being behind the page
-no intellectual challenge
-no emotional challenge
-no flow
-no magic


8. Rewrite to Edit
a. Twenty ways to “unfinal” a draft
-listen to the draft -cut the end -make new connections
-welcome the unexpected -cut or extend the length -reorder the draft
-expand what works -play with a new focus -change the pace
-tune the music of the draft -reconsider the audience -unbalance the proportions
-start closer to the end -put draft into new context -try a new genre
-add new evidence -look for instructive failure -role play a reader
-use a test reader -observe the draft

b. attitude change…writing is editing…trust your ear more than your eye

Exercise: Interview your draft
a. what is the one thing I wanted to say?
b. What single message does the draft deliver?
c. To whom is the message being sent?
d. Does everything in the draft support or advance the message?
e. Where are the greatest failures in the draft?


9. Rewrite at Work


10. The Craft of Letting Go








View all my reviews

Thursday, April 19, 2012

One Step Closer

Introduction: Nature's Presence
Stemming from inspirations from West Chester University's and the National Writing Project graduate course Literacy in Bloom (PWP-510-01) my 8th grade classes wrote, reflected, and dug deeper into nature.   More specifically, this digging was about change.

a) A change in the way I taught some traditional, classic literature.
b) A change in what we wrote and what tools we used.
c) A change in how we connected with the texts.

This final project demonstrates how new knowledge can be applied to current curriculum while, at the same time, incorporating emerging digital technologies...without sacrificing anything.  When we dig deeper, we provide a rich and authentic experience for our students.  We move closer to the text and as you will read here, a closer understanding of our humanity.


The Recent Past

While nature has played a role in the core literature read in class, I had done little with nature over recent years beyond theme.  In September we discussed and wrote about Stephen Crane's use of nature in The Red Badge of Courage. Our pens focused on nature's indifference to man and how it lives on, no matter what man does--as it pertains to the novel.  While men slaughter one another, birds sing on as the cannons quell.  As the clouds of black smoke, oily and choking, dissipate, natural sunlight filters through the lush green canopies of Virgina.  Indeed, nature's indifference overcomes man:
"As he gazed around him the youth felt a flash of astonishment at the blue, pure sky and the sun gleaming on the trees and fields. It was surprising that Nature had gone tranquilly on with her golden process in the midst of so much devilment. " Stephen Crane, The Red Badge of Courage
Yet we had not made any connections with nature in our own lives.  At the same time, dissonant sounds of wrankled students reverberated through the 8th grade--few found much worthy of original thought in their writing and class conversations (except "I don't like it.") in The Red Badge of Courage.  Clearly, class discussions and writing activities occurred at arm's length from the text. We covered the material, but latched onto little.

We found a similar relationship with A Midsummer Night's Dream.

Nature rebels as Oberon and Titania fight.  Contagions, fogs, floods destroy crops, slay wildlife, and threaten the very existence of humanity.  Nature and man have a one-sided relationship--man is subservient to nature and the fairy kingdom.
Therefore the winds, piping to us in vain, 
As in revenge, have suck'd up from the sea
Contagious fogs; which falling in the land
Have every pelting river made so proud
That they have overborne their continents:
The ox hath therefore stretch'd his yoke in vain,
The ploughman lost his sweat, and the green corn
Hath rotted ere his youth attain'd a beard;
The fold stands empty in the drowned field,
William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Nights Dream II.i 

So much of the play occurs in the woods.  The audience is asked to use their imaginations as they take a journey with the characters into enchanted woods that are home to imagination, mischief, and magic.  It is playful--we comprehended the story--but we never dug into our own relationships with the woods, nature, or our imaginations.

More specifically, our discussions and writing about humanity and nature, as a class, fell far short of making any personal connections.  The magical pull of nature, again at arm's length, felt more like the pall of nature--something shrouding an idea.  We didn't lift it to reexamine it as a life experience that we all shared.


My Transformation in the Woods

The work by Richard Louv and David Sobel transformed how I look at nature as a teacher and how I approach nature in literature and our own writing.  While it may be too late this year to establish those connections with The Red Badge of Courage and A Midsummer Night's Dream, Louv and Sobel enhanced and changed our classroom relationships with The Diary of Anne Frank and The Adventures of Tom Sawyer beyond anything I created on my own over the past seventeen years.

Struck most by the work of Richard Louv, I wondered what role the natural world played in the lives of my students--this became my starting point, and our way in, into the woods.  And it was through these class conversations and writing experiences that I began to identify so many missed opportunities in the past for deeper connections between my students and the texts.

Change indeed occurred.

Revisiting Nature
Borrowing an idea from David Sobel's Childhood and Nature, an early writing goal for the class as we started The Diary of Anne Frank was to use writing and digital tools to serve as an ally for something in nature.  First, however, we would reflect on our previous (childhood) relationships with nature, and continue writing about any changes in that relationship over the years.

As an aside, I knew Anne wrote quite a bit about nature and I was hoping to use this because she was cut off from it...and we are not.  Or so I thought.

The results astounded me.  I anticipated most students having a healthy relationship with nature--at the very least I anticipated many of the athletes identifying sports as their current thirteen-year-old connection with the natural world.

It breaks my heart to reveal below what many of the students shared.

After several different drafts in our writer's notebooks, I asked students to write Tweets--design a "golden line" that captures the spirit of your recent writing in 140 characters or less!  I created a unique hashtag for our students, as a way to teach them about using a hashtag to reach an audience.  Hashtags would come into play more directly in the future.

After all, if you use Twitter and have few followers, are you truly writing to an audience?  Hashtags would become our way to reach an audience...when the time was right.  But for now, it was time  to practice and a time to express our thoughts about our relationships with the natural world.


Charming messages like this one above caught my eye and attention at first.

Then, as the students took turns with the iPads and adding their messages, another idea began to emerge--students recognized that they had grown apart from nature, and have lost something in the process.

The simple prompt evoked more than I imagined: Share a line that best represents your relationship with nature.  Consider what it is now, and if it has changed (for better or worse) over the years.



The repetition of loss, being a stranger or an intruder, caught me off guard--even though I had heard Louv's message.  Yet, what troubles me most is the visceral sense for some that they may never get it back.


Nevertheless, the lessons and possibilities for connections to literature blossom within these lines of text.  I began to wonder could I help my students take a step back towards nature?  Could I help repair those relationships through literature and writing?  Undeniably, the two major messages here are a) that nature has been a place of magic, wonder, and inner peace, and b) that magic, that connection, has been displaced by busy lives, speed, technology, and everything we occasionally hear people mutter about young people--their lives are too planned, too packed, too busy.  And technology is only making it go faster.

The privilege is mine as I read their tweets, their blogs, their essays.  While cries of loss permeate the text, the reverence and awe of nature is still a very real seed within them.  As I read the tweets below, Anne Frank's message to Peter of inner peace and happiness resurfaced in a way I'd never grasped:
When I looked outside right into the depth of Nature and God, then I was happy, really happy.  And Peter, so long as I have that happiness here, the joy in nature, health and lot more besides, all the while one has that, one can always recapture happiness.

 


Nothing is too late, but I can't help returning to the feeling that I let some months slip away with these kids.  The love and reverence for those childhood experiences still exists.  Something is indeed left to work with!






A few days back, a student shared that she is developing a theory about honesty and writing--we are most honest when we write.  We tend to be more willing to disguise the truth or bury the truth when we think or silently consider--we convince ourselves of falsehoods, or we repress them and in so doing we no longer need worry.  Out of sight, out of mind.

Just how out of sight and mind had nature become?  The more I read the heart-breaking honesty of my students, the more I was and am left wondering...

...is this student the exception now, and not the rule?

...what is written in between the lines of this student?



...is there still magic out there for this student?
 

...will she ever return?


...would the warmth of this poet's voice have ever reached out? 

...a raw finality sprouts from the word "rests"--almost chilling--do these words speak the plain truth for this generation?

Digging Deeper

Charged with a renewed energy, I re-purposed Sobel's inspiration from nature writer Brenda Petersen,
'In our environmental wars, the emphasis has been on saving species, not becoming them,'
Sobel adds,
"If we aspire to developmentally appropriate science education, then the first task is to become animals, to understand them from the inside out, before asking children to study them or save them."
Having just come off a research paper and not wanting to recycle that approach to information, I distributed a wide range of essays on the natural world.  We read essays and wrote in our writer's notebooks about anything that moved them. At times they wrote from the perspective of their understanding of that creature, plant, circumstance--not a study, not research, not someone telling them what was right or wrong--but we wrote purely from the capacity for compassion.  We tried to place ourselves in the roots of the plant or the hive of the bee.

Short of running around outdoors and growling or flapping our arms like wings, we used our imaginations to insert ourselves in another place, another creature, another circumstance.

After sharing their written work from the point of view of something (animal, plant, etc.) from the natural world, I asked students to write and perfect Tweets, again in their writer's notebooks, and then showed them how to Tweet their perspective out into an interested audience by using real hashtags followed by the public:

As is the case with all of our Tweets, we used a classroom account and a set of six iPads.  Students had to mark their entry with their initials at the end of their Tweets which are only completed and sent from the iPads in my classroom.  They do not have access to this Twitter account outside of class.

While much of their initial work has the patina of activism and a persuasive essay-in-the-making, my goal of asking the students to become the voice for the voiceless started to come together:


Taking turns posting our thoughts beyond the Tweets, we then turned to our classroom blog where some blog entries just absolutely broke my heart:


And others continue to reinforce the message present by Louv--human beings need nature.  And when they do not have it, they miss it.



I like the transition to the blogs because they leave little room for interpretation or possible misreading of a Tweet.  Here, students identify that change had indeed occurred--they have grown apart from nature:


The same message resonates loud and clear with many subsequent blog entries:


And when students are not lamenting the loss of nature in their lives, they revel in the memories once shared in nature:


In the end, I can only conclude that nature and young people is a significant topic to continue to study.   People such as Richard Louv and David Sobel need to be read, heard, and shared with parents and educators.

The Nature of Anne Frank
With my own awareness heightened, I tuned into more than Anne Frank's long-lauded and highly publicized chestnut tree.  Passages I never noticed before stood out. Only six months before their discovery and capture, Anne irrevocably joins nature and happiness hand in hand:
"As long as this exists," I thought, "and I may live to see it, this sunshine, the cloudless skies, while this lasts, I cannot be unhappy."
I see parallels between Anne's desire for nature and the experiences my students remember of their childhoods:





 

 We are still reading and writing about Anne Frank, and the more we write about our own connections and slow down while reading Anne Frank's diary, appreciating her connections, the closer we grow to the text.

This student identifies power of Anne's use of the word "privilege."  Who in my community of learners could imagine that taking a breath of fresh air could be a privilege?  Can we even identify with that here in America?  I like that my student in this blog post, at the very least, acknowledges the concept of breathing as a privilege as "unreal" to her.


Additionally, this segment from a recent student essay resonates with Anne Frank's belief that her happiness is tied to Nature and God, and we all have access to all of it...if we would only take the time:

The Future: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
As a class, we will read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer in May.  My typical use of literary connections will still be in place, but I am looking forward to slowing down to connect with the text.  

I'm thinking of using Tom's running to the woods to remain a child, to play (Robin Hood, and Pirates), to imagination to reconnect to the ideas my students have already expressed.  As writing is a recursive process, I'm interested in seeing my students use a highlighter to go back through their writer's notebook to find sentences, phrases, ideas that fit, in any way, with Tom's need to escape to childhood, to play...to breath the fresh air.

Concluding Thoughts
Studying nature as a writer has reminded that I am not powerless--on the contrary, as a teacher I wield the great privilege of power and influence over how young people think, what young people read, and what young people do with their writing.  Taking Literacy in Bloom and integrating the ideas learned in that class back into my classroom taught me the research and work of people such as Richard Louv, David Sobel is closer to the heart-wrenching truth, stark and alarming.

Today's goal is as simple as tomorrow's goal--help my students slow down, look to the outdoors again, and take one more step closer to the texts they read and the texts they write...and in so doing, one more step closer to themselves and the natural world.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Twitter in the Classroom

Tomorrow I take a leap with my 8th grade students in an attempt to teach them that digital tools are tools and not toys.  We started on Friday with a brief conversation about Twitter--many students smiled, most do not use Twitter, but they know of it.  Those who do use it, do so to keep up with friends or celebrities and athletes.

The lesson coincides with the deployment of a small set of iPads in my classroom.  Acquired through a modest grant that I wrote in September, the lesson is also the first use of the iPad as a tool in my classroom.

I set up a classroom Twitter account @8grwriters last week.  So far, the account is following 40 writers or writing publications.  We also have a modest five followers as of today.

The account is locked into the Twitter app on the iPads.  The students will not receive the password from me--they can only access the account from school, with me, and the in-class iPads. 

When they Tweet they will only place their initials at the end of the tweet to help protect their anonymity, but to also help me manage who asked or said what.  They may also only reply to any incoming tweets or messages only after I see them--I have an administrative iPads and monitor everything going on with the account live as it happens in class, so it is unlikely that something would slip by me.

I knew we would follow writers and try to use Twitter as a way to bring mentors into the classroom, but I was struck with inspiration while at a writing course this weekend.  I am taking Literacy in Bloom which is a 3 credit graduate course offered in conjunction through the Pennsylvania Writing & Literature Project and Longwood Gardens.

The impulse came from a reading and discussion of an excerpt from David Sobel's Childhood and Nature in which he quotes Brenda Petersen:
In our environmental wars, the emphasis has been on saving species, not becoming them.
Sobel, speaking mainly of elementary school children adds:
If we aspire to developmentally appropriate science education, then the first task is to become animals, to understand them from the inside out, before asking children to study them or save them.
 That gave me pause--we just finished a research paper in my class, but I had been thinking that I want them to continue using research principles in their writing.   The tools and lessons of research are recursive, not isolated lessons--and the ideas flooded into me at once.

Use the Twitter classroom to explore the nature world--to begin to help my students transition from a purely emotional connection to animals to one of a great human responsibility and awareness--see and read what is going on with animals, insects, plants, and natural resources.   And then go back to square one--strive to understand the animal, insect, plant, or natural resource.  Read it, see it live if we can, write about it, and write from its perspective--become the voice of the honeybee or the bluebird or the white-tailed deer.

Add to the conversation online and in our community.

Starting tomorrow I will teach them about the basics of Twitter and the difference between our following writers and our using hashtags to explore our objective of becoming an ally for something in the natural world.

I have generated a list of hashtags for the students to browse and to see what topics catch their interest.  Some examples are #animals,  #animalwelfare,  #deforestation,  #endangered, #environment, #greentweets, #ocean, #organic, #pesticides, #solar, #trees, #wildlife. 

We will explore these hashtags, read the articles, find more information in our library or online, and write journal entries, informative and persuasive drafts, poetry, and then strive to publish our work whether it is through a thoughtful tweet, a blog, the local paper, or other avenues of publication for teens.

The use of a classroom Twitter account provides young people authentic audiences for their words, invites connected learning, and moves the students, their voices, and their writing outside of our four walls and into the boundless classroom of the natural world. My 8th graders are transitioning from an emotional and cognitive connection with the natural world to an ethical and ecological responsibility by the time they graduate from high school.  I am hoping to provide a part of the early steps of that maturity and awareness while developing their writing skills, feeding their need to inquire, and showing them how digital tools are just that, tools, and not primarily tools.

While it may interest an individual teenager to know how Cee Lo Green may be doing today, the world will be a better place if I can also get them interested in how the planet is doing.  It will be really interesting to read their questions and their subsequent essays, but it will be equally as interesting to see what kinds of connections they make, who treats their question seriously and responds, and who follows the work they are about to engage.




Friday, February 3, 2012

Mentor, Research, & Cubism as Writer

In an effort to continue to provide mentors in the classroom to inspire, support, and shape student writing, I wrote an email to local author Carrie Hagen (we is got him) and asked if she would either chat with  my students through Skype or visit or school.  I had never met Hagen, but learned that she was an NWP Fellow and heard she spoke recently to a group of Fellows at West Chester University--it was worth the shot.

I have learned with technology and social networking that we have access today to people beyond status updates and pictures of the weekend.  We are all able to access authors, musicians, scientists, historians (around the world) and if we would like someone to speak with our students all we have to do is ask.  They may say no just as easily as yes--for teachers it is worth the shot.  I've found more have said yes than no.  My experience with Hagen not only served the purpose of providing a mentor in the classroom (a best writer in the room) but it also inspired me to build a new research unit...an unexpected bonus.

Hagen spoke to three of my classes--and we tried something a little different with the author chat.  We included a guided writing activity and a sharing session with a revision of a piece due that day for homework.

For most author chats, I ask the author to speak about a specific topic for 10-15 minutes or so and then open up the floor to student questions.  As long as I prep the students in advance, and give them a chance to write down some questions, they fill the last 30 minutes with terrific questions about writing--situations they face, are confused be, or are curious about.  Otherwise, they struggle and seem to feel on the spot.

A few days in advance, Hagen sent me a couple of pages of drafts from her novel, and then a revision of each.  The drafts included her editor's notes (about content and not grammar).  I copied and distributed them to my students and then read through it with them day before--I wanted them have a familiarity of the content before Hagen arrived the next day.

Since she wrote a nonfiction account of the first kidnapping in America for ransom, Hagen asked the students about their experiences with true crime (novels, television shows, film).  Once they got the feel that her story was true crime, and exciting to research and write, Hagen outlined three must-haves for her writing:

1. read what you want to write
2. write character-driven scenes
3. write most sentences with the S-V close together and close to the front of the sentences

Read what you want to write:  It answers question--how do you do it?  where do you start?  how do you organize it?  Hagen shared a passage about serial killer H.H. Holmes from Erik Larson's The Devil in the White City and how that style of writing inspires her.  It is nonfiction...but it is creative!  Nonfiction can be really exciting true content and still leave so much room for you to exercise your creative muscles.  We make so many decisions when we write, we can't but be creative.  The difference is in what you know--it has to be based in fact.  You have to read, research, ask questions, and stand in the places you write of.  Writing nonfiction is an experience and the more you read it the better chance you have to write your own powerful and moving story.

Write character-driven scenes: this was interesting because Hagen's scene in our hands was driven by a character she did not want to take over the story.  The difference in her draft and her revision was that she explained more about his job as a detective in 1874 and how many policemen moonlighted as detectives, and were often corrupt.  This still provided a scene built around a character, but we didn't get too personal as a reader--we learned something about him, but not so in depth that we connected to him rather than someone more important to the core of the story.

Write with S-V: While the students had their own copies of the scene and highlights and pens out, I projected a copy of the page onto the Smartboard.  Identifying the subject and verb in each sentence with the class, Hagen led us through a paragraph --we highlighted each.  She pointed out how most sentences had the S-V close together, and only one or two allowed for a variation in this structure.  This promoted clarity, the active voice, and kept the action moving.

We then revised a sentence of Hagen's from the novel:

Somewhere along these muddy streets lurked a man who he believed could identify the kidnappers.

While encouraging them to remove anything they wanted from the sentence, Hagen invited the students to change the subject or verb, but retain the message of the sentence.

Some revisions:

A kidnapper lurked in the street.
A kidnapper haunted these muddy streets.
A shadow lurked in the man, a kidnapper.

Afterwards, we had the students pull out their own writing to share with the class.  A revision of a draft of an extended metaphor was due in class. Asking for volunteers, students were willing to share in the presence of an author at about the same rate on a typical day--some were eager, others not so much.  Hagen praised each for a turn of a phrase, an image, or an idea--it was good to see the students receive the positive feedback from someone other than me.  I love anything we can do as educators to raise their image of themselves in their own eyes.


Overall, the discussion served as a great bridge for me into research, journalism, and creative nonfiction.  When Hagen shared that nonfiction answers our desire as human beings for the WHAT and the WHY, I found inspiration for an upcoming research unit and lesson.

She said to learn what happened takes time...takes research...we have to collect fragments (some more clear than others) but once you find enough pieces, a picture begins to form...the WHAT, more or less, is clearly plotted on a timeline.  (Good, focused, use of library time.  Pick something in our community, a topic of interest, something historical, and find a change--find out what happened.)

The why, Hagen countered, is more difficult--it takes a while to think about.  And the more you draft and write about the why (or what you think the why could be) the clearer it becomes.  You don't really know what your writing is about until it is all written down.  (Good use of writing workshop time buttressed by our research.)

In this respect the writing process is like Cubism--take a topic, find its pieces, and reassemble them.  As writers we can never truly reassemble pieces of research into the entire truth, the entire picture.  The picture we write is always influenced by what we bring to the exercise: our wants, fears, and prejudices.   

I think the extended metaphor that writing a research essay, or creative nonfiction, or journalism is Cubism brought me to a 1923 self portrait by Dali.  This image will serve as opening discussion piece to bring in what my students learned from Hagen and then carry it forward to what we are about to do as writers: find pieces and reassemble them.






Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Digital Is...in my world.

Tomorrow is Digital Learning Day for the National Writing Project and their "Digital Is..." initiative.  I've been following the build up on Twitter and want to weigh in.


My plan for Digital Learning Day is more than a day--I have taught the lesson in increments and tomorrow will be just one more day in that build-up to a digital product.

We are writing visual stories.

Taking a cue from a group on Flickr I am asking my students to compose a story with five images.  We are currently studying "Story" --their notes highlight that there are four basic types of story: love story, someone goes on a journey, worlds collide, and a stranger comes to town.  We also dig deeper in the concepts that all stories have some form of conflict, obstacles, and change.

We are going to attempt to demonstrate those aspects of storytelling in our visual stories.

Students have asked if it could be more than five images.  I like the five image limit in that it is like poetry--we have to be precise.  We have to select just the right image and place it at the just the right time.

Students are allowed to use any pre-existing images from home, new digital images, drawn/painted images, other creative composition images (construction paper, etc.), as well as anything from our school subscription to ImageQuest (a compilation of royalty free/public domain images hosted by Encyclopedia Britannica).

Rather than log the students into Flickr, we will use our own Moodle site.  Students have used this to load podcasts along with other products.  I'll have create a link on our classroom wiki that takes viewers directly to their visual story from their individual online portfolios on the wiki.

Planning something for this day inspired a thought--are we at a point where separate, isolated computer labs and classes are an inefficient model?  Considering the rate in which technology is evolving, and the varying differences in comfort and expertise among teachers, would we be better served if technology was blended into rooms, departments, or teams?

Our building is a 6 through 8 middle school--could we see the day where a technology teacher was assigned to each grade and learned to blend his/her curriculum in with the rest of the subjects of the school?  For the sake of argument, a tech teacher could spend week one in Teacher A's Science class, week two in teach B's Social Studies class, etc.

Of course, rooms would have to be revamped--more outlets, USB ports, and hardware--or perhaps mobile carts traveled with the tech teacher.  He/She could rotate--in our school we have twelve core subject teachers in 8th grade.  We would potentially co-teach once every twelve weeks--three times a year. 

I'm just think out loud, inspired by the spirit of tomorrow.  I'm wondering if any schools have a blended technology plan rather than a plan which sets technology as isolated rooms (technology dumps)...

Another advantage to this approach, would be the ability to train and develop the tech saavy of all of the teachers throughout the year...something that I believe our education system needs to consider nationwide.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

The Simple Truth about Writing

In response to the article Writing Lessons by Jay Mathews of the Washington Post:


I teach 8th grade, and at times I can’t help but think about myself when I was in 8th grade.  This is natural for most people; we tend to lean on our experiences as a student when we deal with the ups and downs of our own kids.

Sometimes a colleague may ask the group in the faculty lunchroom, “which of these 8th graders were you most like?”  I used to have fun with that question, but I now have an answer for the entirety of the rest of my teaching career: none.

I was like none.

If we include technology (email, chat, texting, et al.), the students I teach today write more than I ever did at their age.  Recent research by the National Assessment of Education Progress indicates that while most students have mastered the basics of writing, they can not write well.

The research by the NEAP specifically states that few students are able to produce meaningful writing which engages a reader with any precise, engaging, or coherent prose.

Today, young people compose writing with their thumbs at a blinding rate of speed and a highly skilled aptitude on an area of screen the size of a few postage stamps.  When I was in 8th grade, I either held a pencil or I used a typewriter.

Today's students truncate words to their benefit, and sometimes for humor.  They use symbol and code to communicate efficiently.  When I truncated words I had to learn how to use white-out and then retype over the dried white-out.

My high school typing instructor, Brother Joe Mulholland, seeing my students use their thumbs to type, would have shuddered in his white cassock.  Don't kids know what pica and elite are anymore?  Don't they know the five-paragraph essay?

I was, indeed, like none.

Since social networking saturated the free-time of young people in the mid-2000s, our students have
written more collectively than young people ever did in the history of mankind.  When I typed at home, there as no immediate audience.

Today, when students write on their personal devices they do so to an active and immediate audience.
Yet, few, adolescent or adult, call this act writing.

There is a disconnect between what our students are writing online and what they are able to produce on paper.  The NEAP data explicitly states that when students are asked to write on paper most produce rudimentary and uninteresting ideas.  Their writing satisfies only the basic skills most associate with their adolescent writing experience—grammar and structure.  It underscores what our nation demands, believes, and emphasizes: when classroom instruction is hammering the kids on grammar and structure, great teaching is occurring.

Because that is what most people remember from their own experiences.

Furthermore, mom and dad are less likely to raise a stink with the current English teacher if they see an abundance of errors noted on their child’s essay.  They see evidence of correction, it likely resembles their childhood experience; therefore, it must be right.

Today’s student has been thrust into a society where strong writing is implicit in order to work towards a successful and abundant life.  To borrow from Troy Hicks, adolescents are natives to digital writing and adults are the immigrants.  While young people may not exactly be native to digital writing they are certainly "tech comfy."  They were and are being born into this nano-age.  Yet, we are the ones teaching.

The digital immigrants are in charge. 

If we do not act, we will miss out on a tremendous opportunity to help our young people develop an already critical skill on which new premiums and new criticisms have been placed.

There does not need to be a disconnect between the writing for technology and writing as a basic and necessary social and professional skill.  Part of the lag in our nation's writing is that professional development programs generated by districts or county intermediate units rarely invite teachers to see themselves as writers--until they meet the National Writing Project.

It took me 15 professional years to find the NWP.  I'd always dabbled as a writer, but it took me 15 professional years to see myself as a writer.

Student teachers and student observers come into my English classroom from all of our local universities without any sense of themselves as a writer.  I've asked them.  And I've asked them if they have ever had any instruction through the National Writing Project--I have yet to meet one.  I know many are out there--I've met parents of my students just this year who are also Fellows in the NWP.

They came to be Fellows only after 10 or more years of establishing a teaching career.

It isn't their fault.  After all, they are (we are) teaching what we have been taught, following the wishes of our community and administrative leaders, and we are also drawing back on our own experiences in the classroom as students.

What's worse, having secured a teaching position, many English teachers typically receive little instruction in how to teach writing—and by that I do mean to stress and repeat that the ability to correct grammar and usage does not in and of itself lead to any instruction on writing.

Additionally, few teachers outside of our English departments receive any instruction on writing at all, let alone receive encouragement to be a writer and see themselves as a writer.

The simple truth is, in many schools, writing is generally assigned to the students by teachers who do not see themselves as writers because they do not write themselves. As such, writing is not a shared experience.  Writing is not produced for authentic audiences and for authentic purposes.

With a wealth of research and technology around us, many are still using the traditional techniques used on them.  We are back in typing class, fingers curled, typing to no one together.  Students are cringing at their returned papers; the red slashes symbols of their failure and inadequacies...as editors.

We've made ourselves judges of writing.  Subsequently, the students are trying to please to gain the prize of an A...or a 6 on a rubric. Their voices stripped down to following state guidelines, conventions, and a teacher's taste, they produce writing which is technically acceptable but says nothing.

When we write with our students and share our imperfect drafts we elevate the significance of the very act of the process of writing.  We move away from judge and closer to mentor.  And this act of the mentor in the classroom writing alongside of them—this elevation of the act of writing in a student's eyes—should not exist just inside the English teacher’s classroom.

When colleagues outside of the English classrooms suggest that they can’t teach writing in their classes, they say so out of fear.  Without the proper knowledge of knowing how to root out errors they believe, indirectly, that writing serves little purpose in their classes beyond providing an answer to a specific question. Some may not feel qualified.  Some may defend themselves and suggest that they already assign some writing.

What an ugly word when it comes to writing—assign.

What an ugly perception of our role—rooting out errors. 

We are to blame for that stifling language and perception.

We can begin to resuscitate writing by changing the way we all see writing: teaching writing is teaching thinking.  

Some of the seminal research in this area has been widely documented and tested.  In A Writer Teaches Writing, Donald Murrary observes the common and easily made mistakes by well-intentioned educators:
Meaning is not thought up and then written down.  The act of writing is an act of thought. [Teachers] give writing assignments based on the assumption that  writing begins after thinking is concluded, and they respond to those assignments as if the etiquette of language were more important than the thinking represented by language. (3) 
We are also to blame, as Tom Romano suggests, for the dinner party commentary we are all doomed to experience: “You’re an English teacher?  Oh—I should mind my grammar.”

We are, indeed, to blame for that language and that perception.  That is our legacy as English teachers as it currently stands. I have 17 years in the profession and that is a legacy I am not comfortable with.

We can all learn from and apply the research and inquiry by the NWP, the NCTE, the NEAP, and separate research, observation, and studies published by education pioneers: Don Murray, Ralph Fletcher, Nancy Atwell, Peter Elbow, Tom Romano, Lucy Calkins, Randy Bomer, Katie Wood Ray and many others.

We are too good, too talented, and there is too much accessible information available for us (especially through technology) not to rethink what we do when it comes to teaching writing. 

Teachers involved with the NWP are some of the most supportive and humble people I know.   Through this program, the opportunity is there for us to change the game.  When teachers are writers then they are using writing as active thinkers.  When our kids see writing as an opportunity to think and develop their unique voices, this changes the game.

It would be absurd to send your child to a piano teacher who does not play—even socially.  It is a waste of your dollar to sign your child up for batting lessons, soccer lessons, or dance lessons from someone who does not understand the first-hand struggle of improving in those pursuits.  One of the beauties about writing (and there are many) is it does not wear out your joints, it does not cause you to have a bad back—you can do it until you die.

The only thing stopping us is us…and time.  I’m proposing that we make that time in our profession.

Once teachers believe that they are writers and do it, the writing produced from our students will grow and improve.  Until that happens writing will not improve in our schools—we are doomed to repeat what we already do and know--the things we are already comfortable with because they were done to us.

Furthermore, unless it is important to us then this change will never get done.

At the rehearsal dinner for a close friend, his father lifted his glass high in a toast to the room and then looked at his son and offered his advice for all to hear: “Love is not what you say, it is what you do.”

Similarly, writing is not what we say, it is what we do.  Or should do.

We have to be the model of the change we desire--nothing is simpler, nothing is truer.

If you currently do not write regularly now, then write.  Take the journey again.  Write in a journal in the morning before school.  Write during class with your students.  Explore your own thoughts or confusion regarding a particular general, artist, or current event.  Write about math.  Write about science.  What about life.  Write not to be judged, but to model the process of creating precise, engaging, and coherent prose which our students can not produce.

If we are not a part of the solution then we are a part of the recurring problem; therefore, we must write.  

In the article on the student by the NAEP, The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution, part of the recommendation is for students to write every day in an environment fostered by teachers who have been offered support and professional development in order to “see themselves as writers—to experience the power and satisfaction of writing as a means of learning and self-expression.”

This is your staff development.  Ask for it; demand it.  We must do it first so that we can experience the age when all teachers in all subjects write and use writing with their students.

We must lead that evolution.  We can’t teach what we don’t know.  And if we do not write then we do not know writing.

We must write.

If you have not taken part in a NWP summer workshop then find one in your area and take one.  Build a professional library of writing texts in your home or school and set your mind to the fact that if you teach, then you should also write.

We must lead the evolution.  Writing is one of the few remaining common filters of thinking, discovery, and being human.  As Randy Bomer wrote in Time for Meaning:
Once I have identified myself as a writer, even if writing still scares me to death, I have located writing not as some school activity that is outside me, but as a part of my life, for better or worse, and that gives me the hope of being alive to change and growth. (22)
We can not continue to pass on the opportunity to use something so profound and powerful. Whether it is writing about scientific inquiry, or mathematical induction, or your thoughts on an upcoming family decision, writing shows us our humanity. 

Write.  Decades of research, study, and observation cannot implement itself.




References

Bomer, Randy. Time for meaning: crafting literate lives in middle and high school. BoyntonCook, 1995. Print.

Gallagher, Kelly. Teaching Adolescent Writers. Stenhouse Pub, 2006. Print. 

Hicks, Troy. The Digital Writing Workshop. Heinemann Educational Books, 2009. Print. 

Murray, Donald. A writer teaches writing. Houghton Mifflin College Div, 1985. Print.

National
 Commission
on 
Writing 
for
 America's
 Families,
 Schools 
and 
Colleges.
 (2003). 
The
neglected
“R”:
 The
 need 
for 
a
 writing 
revolution.


Romano, Tom. Clearing the way: working with teenage writers. BoyntonCook, 1987. Print.

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Altering one's aspect towards the sun

The transition to an NWP-inspired writer's workshop classroom has continued to move smoothly now that we are through our third calendar week of school.

Some concerns voiced early by colleagues from around the region during the NWP Summer Institute had to do with being in "literature-based" classrooms.  How do we use the writing-based methods in a literature-based classroom?

I'm learning it isn't a square peg - round hole scenario.

Writing and reading are so co-dependent that it seems silly to me now to even type that statement.  A piece of the fear I suppose is more clearly stated, how can we devote so much time for students to write what they want when I have content and literature to teach?



Again, I'm learning it isn't a square peg - round hole scenario.  To borrow from the spirit of what Virginia Woolf meant when she wrote, "I don't believe in aging, I believe in forever altering one's aspect towards the sun."  We don't have to view ourselves as teachers as on a set of rails.  The methods we use are one of many possibilities.  I learned this summer after 17 years of teaching that I need to be willing to believe that there is another way.

My example over the last week brings Stephen Crane to the table, front and center.  Our students had to read The Red Badge of Courage as one of their summer reading selections.  And they struggled with it.  Some offer their soured opinions of it openly.  I and my colleagues in my building have also heard the opinions of some adults that the book is too hard for these kids and that their kids hated it.

Well, time to roll up our sleeves then and get to work.

Learning is allowed to be uncomfortable at times.  With a published RL of 7.43 (appropriate for grades 7-8, or ages 12-14) that hardly seems to be the issue.  The kids I teach are generally good readers--I often find that they have a current YA title in their hand when moving class to class.  I even had a boy recommend a book to me (Way of the Peaceful Warrior, by Dan Millman) last week.  Several students have already borrowed novels from my classroom library on their own.  The issue, in this case, I believe rests in the fact that TRBC is not necessarily a novel which hurtles along a rollicking plot line.  Plot isn't at the forefront.  It is built upon the psychology of one soldier and develops with thickly ladled imagery.  It isn't anything like what most of the kids I teach read.

At NWP we're taught to ask our kids, "what have you read which is like what you are trying to write?"

I took that lesson from this summer, altered the way I looked at the sun, and placed a small passage by Crane under my classroom ELMO document camera and projected it on the wall.  I circled nouns, highlighted adjectives, underlined verbs, noted articles and pronouns and phrases and clauses.  And then together as a class we would write like Crane...we would imitate this passage.  Where Crane placed an article, we would place an article.  Where Crane crafted a prepositional phrase, we would craft a prepositional phrase, etc.

What have you read which is like what you are trying to write?

I told them we must change the subject of what we are imitating.  That took knowledge of the passage.  We read it aloud, discussed it, and decided that Crane took the time, showed the patience, to describe a "horde" of soldiers moving forward.  However, a student noted that it was more than that.  It was how two different sets of eyes might describe the "horde" of soldiers--some might say they were grizzled and angry and ready to tear a house apart piece of wood by piece of wood, others might suggest they were sad, hungry, and weak.

We decided to write our passage about a "swarm" of butterflies from the perception of someone who loves nature, and then from the perception of a child.

As we plugged in words shouted out at each step, a student offered that this was like Mad Libs. And it seemed like they were having fun as we wrote in the style of Crane, as we imitated the syntax of a author they were grumbling about just a few weeks ago.

Our "original" Crane passage...by the way "blithe" is one of our vocabulary words so we were excited to include it:

Some whispered of golden, freckled swarms that were drifting with blithe dips and twisting ascents with awe-inspiring beauty; fragile wings of gentle creatures who flutter like autumn in the wind.  Others cheered floating and eternally playful crayons that played tag in the sky.

I loved their piecing together the perception of children....butterflies are crayons playing tag.

After modeling this, I distributed a variety of brief passages by Crane and asked them to do the same thing individually.

The lesson allowed me to circulate around the room and assist kids with identifying parts of speech, and it also allowed me to dust off the classroom set of the most foreign of books to my kids--the thesaurus.  I gave each kid one to use to grow their writing as we also discussed imagery and motif in small, individual conferences.  The lesson also offered opportunities for me to talk about Crane in small chunks, one on one with kids, as they worked on deciphering what we meant and how his craft influenced his story.

The kids wrote about things they wanted to but in the patterns and style of Crane.  I heard Cranesque passages about everything from football and lacrosse to pumpkin picking and dance lessons.  When the students read them aloud to the class we noted the similar cadence and rhythm in what we wrote, but the vastly different stories.  We noted that this imitative lesson made us be patient as writers and it taught us to be open-minded toward an author and a book some despised only days ago.

We have repeated the lesson twice so far--I'm hopeful at least a few will choose to continue to work on their Crane piece and submit it as one of their upcoming essays and/or submit it to a teen magazine such as Teen Ink (which is an online magazine).  Some of what they shared was just so beautiful that it would be a shame to keep it cooped up in their writer's notebooks for eternity.

Writing is thinking, and I do believe that even in our traditional content-based literature classrooms, we can alter what we've always done and use writing more as a vehicle for taking the kids, and ourselves, beyond anyplace we've ever visited before in our classrooms.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Stopped in our Tracks--bridging the Writer's Notebook to literature

Now that all students had a writer's notebook we set out to write in it--their first entry was to be written at home: write about three things which stopped you in your tracks.  We wrote to this prompt during one of our classes at our NWP SI and I really liked the results then, so wanted to try it with my students.

When the students arrived with their three thoughtful entries I asked them to read over them and choose one.  Choose the one which matters to you most, for whatever reason.  Start a new entry where you explain why this one is most important to you.  (By the way, I do the assignments as well, and write alongside of the students as they write.  I try to change my seat in the room daily, as I change their seats daily as well).

After ten minutes we paused and I asked them to skip a space and to think (through writing) what the core issue is in what they have been currently writing about.  What is it that matters to them beyond this one incident.  What is truly at the heart of why this one incident matters to them?

As an example I shared this fictional progression which I created:

An event which stopped me in my tracks was my sister borrowed my favorite hooded sweatshirt without asking.  She ruined it--stains were all over it.  And then she tried to fold it and slip it back into my closet without my knowing she ever had it in the first place.


I chose this event as the most important because I had always had a great relationship with my sister.  We were great friends.  But this event altered our friendship--for the first time ever I felt trust issues with my sister.  I began to question and wonder had she done anything similar with me in the past.


At the heart of this incident is the fact that trust is extremely important to me.  It is something I rarely talk about or plan for, but it just is.  And you can't say it, you can't just say you trust someone...you have to show it, do it. Trust is an action way more than it is a spoken word.


So then my students went forward and wrote about what was at the heart of their writing, what truly mattered to them.  After we finished writing, we did a large group share--some shared, not many.  We are still building community.  I didn't press it which worked out fine because I had a concluding mini-lesson to get to with the remaining ten minutes of class:

I just asked all of you to write for a few days about things which matter to you.  At the heart of many pieces of writing is something which mattered to an author.  Whether it is an article in magazine or a YA novel, authors write about things which are important to them.

You all read The Red Badge of Courage for summer reading--take a moment and put aside your struggles or personal opinions about the book.  Take a moment and think with your pen, what do you think was important to Stephen Crane?  Based on the book, what do you think was at the heart of what mattered to him--go deeper than plot.  Go to that place that you just visited yourself...and think about what Crane must have felt or believed deep inside of himself.  Write that.  There is no right or wrong.  I do not know myself...and I will write my own thoughts myself along with you.



With the final five minutes we shared what we thought and called it a day.

How the NWP altered my teaching--Day 1

Using methods learned at my National Writing Project summer institute, the first week of school in my creative writing classes surpassed my expectations.  I want to share how I developed the class over the course of this first week, but it can summed up in one word--mentoring.  I am becoming more of a mentor writing alongside of them as well as conferring constantly with many of them throughout the class.

In a series of blog posts, I want to share how each day progressed during this first week:

Day 1--Names
Students wrote their names in crayon on a name card (construction paper of various colors) which, when folded, stands up on their desk like a nameplate.  I cut a full sheet in half and then folder that to create a blank nameplate.  I should add that my students sit in groups every day in my classroom.  I asked the students to doodle something important to them in the upper right hand corner--we then went around the room and gave a brief summary of what we doodled and why it was important to us.  I created my own nameplate and also doodled a picture.

These name plates served as our template to write on (as many students did not have a notebook/journal yet for class).  I also use these every day by placing their nameplate on a different desk each day.  Students sit with different groups of kids every day--when kids in my homeroom (who do not have me for class) heard about it after the first few days many piped up, "Ooh I'd like that!"  Many in my classes have also enjoyed the variety and daily hunt for their card.

The first writing assignment we did on the nameplate was actually a drawing.  We opened the card to draw on the "inside" of it.  I asked the students to draw a "neighborhood" that they know...it could literally be the neighborhood they live in now, one they used to live it, a combination of all of the neighborhoods they've ever lived in, or even a neighborhood of their life (a series of images of all of the fascinating, important, memorable moments, places, people, encounters they have experienced).

We then did a small group share (5 or so in a group), where each student explained their neighborhood to their group.  I had sketched a sample neighborhood of mine on the board as a model--but I also drew my own neighborhood inside of my own card alongside of them.  I did this with each class.  Rather than create five separate cards for each of my five classes, I just kept adding to my neighborhood map.  By the end of the day I had a highly detailed map for students to use as a model.

This ended Day 1--we would use the neighborhood map during Day 2.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Resource Book Review: A Writer Teaches Writing

A Writer Teaches Writing: A Complete RevisionA Writer Teaches Writing: A Complete Revision by Donald Morison Murray

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


When immersed in reading about writing and the teaching of writing, the real McCoy stands out prominently. This book, clear about its focus from the beginning, is page after page after page of how anyone can transform their classroom into a writing classroom: activities, lessons, adjustments in classroom expectations or procedures, and even how to assess and comment. This is the book where you can access something easily and know that it is steeped in research and practice.

The meaty final few chapters may be of particular interest to you as they address three universal circumstances: problem writers, answers to questions you may ask yourself, and answers to questions others may ask you.

Some of the issues Murray addresses in these chapters are: the student who doesn't care; the student who can't spell, punctuate and aint got not grammar;the student who demands the formula; the student who simply loves to write--and write and write;should I accept papers from other courses; should I share my writing with my students; when do you teach grammar; what is the relationship between reading and writing; and does this work only in a creative writing course? And there are many more.

In addition to answering many of the questions teachers have, Murray also provides a very strong chapter on conference techniques for the teacher. This is worth the price of the book itself.









View all my reviews